You are Here > Home > Banking > What do you want from your bank?

What do you want from your bank?

by | Mar 7, 2012

This week I received a survey on what customers want from their banks. The Speak UP Report commissioned by Capitec aims to “draw attention to what people want from their bank and ultimately help give them what they really need”.

I have to confess that when I read some of the comments I was amazed at the naivety of bank customers. People wanted the bank to send someone to their house, they wanted more tellers, more face to face interaction, more personal service – but they all wanted lower bank fees. Someone else’s time is money and the less bank fees we want to pay the more automated our banking will become. As a customer one needs to decide whether you want to pay for personal service or if you want to save costs by using electronic channels.

Many people also complained about the high cost of banking, 56% said that if the finance minister could change one thing in 2012 it would be to slash bank fees – yet one can bank for under R50 a month if you manage your account effectively.

Personally my monthly bank costs are around R30 a month as I use the old Go Banking account which was a collaboration between PicknPay and Nedbank. Despite being the cheapest fully transactional bank account in the country it failed to attract more than 90 000 customers and was eventually closed to new business. At the time I lamented that this was proof that South Africans love to complain about bank fees but are not prepared to actually do anything about it – like change banks.

I am still waiting for the day Nedbank informs me that they are closing the account permanently at which point I would move to one of the banks’ low cost accounts that will let me bank for R30-R40 a month. I certainly don’t need a gold card or an overdraft facility, all of which come at additional costs.

So why do people complain about fees? I would argue that it is because fees are so hard to understand and lack transparency. Often customers do not know that there are cheaper options – and let’s be honest, is it really in the bank’s interest to have you use their cheapest account?

In the survey 43% said it was impossible to understand bank fees. I am surprised this figure is so low. As someone who deals with banks and bank fees for a living, trying to compare bank costs is virtually impossible and there are many hidden fees. How many customers know how much it costs them to withdraw from another bank’s ATM or what it costs to deposit money at a branch? What is the penalty fee for a bounced debit order and how much do you pay for an overdraft facility?

According to the survey many consumers would welcome an industry standard menu of fees as it’s impossible to compare like with like among the banks while 37% said they’d tried, but gave up as it took up too much time. Personally I would like to banks being able to demonstrate how much you will be paying for each type of bank account based on your typical monthly banking profile so that one can select the most cost effective account and also highlight where one can cut back on costs.

Another comment that surprised me is that some people wanted banks to cut back on paper by issuing electronic statements rather than posting them. I know from experience that Nedbank, FNB and Absa can all provide electronic statements so perhaps some clients have just not asked for it.

A point close to my heart is the issue of red tape which came up as a major frustration for clients. Unfortunately this is not something the banks can do anything about as it is government regulation around FICA and “Know your Client” that creates the realms of paperwork which make it a mission to open or change bank accounts. Hopefully a central FICA database is something the government will approve to cut time and costs.

A very astute comment from a consumer was that “a lot of people fear opening bank accounts because they feel they will be made to communicate in English with the tellers. Have specific queues for the most spoken African languages that would make me feel more comfortable”. That is an excellent point and hopefully something the banks will listen to.

We all want a more personalised service from our bank especially when it comes to managing our money. The bank that can create that perception while keeping fees relatively low will score with clients. This is a model that both Capitec and FNB are working on by automating administrative processes and innovating solutions that allow more client interaction.  However the reality is that consumers put up with poor service because it is often easier than making the move. Ultimately we pay the bank fees and receive the service that we deserve.

This article by Maya Fisher-French was first published in City Press

2 Comments

  1. Hi Maya,

    I feel that consumers are equally to blame for paying high bank fees.
    I know for a fact that Absa, Fnb, and Nedbank provides a detail break down of their bank fees, which can be obtained from both their website or in branch.
    Consumers are very quick to blame the banks, instead of making an effort to educate themselves. Capitec has the advert about transparency and everyone raves about the 6% interest rate you receive from them. However, do consumers know, that the 6% is only available if you have less than 10K in the account?
    If I place 100K into the account, I only get around 4% interest. You can’t blame the bank for me expecting 6% instead. It is the consumers responsibility to educate themselves and research the product they are purchasing. After all, it is their money and not the banks. People would spend hours researching their next contract phone, but won’t do the same for a bank.

    Consider the examples:
    + Bob buys a bottle of whiskey for R2K, which he clearly can’t afford. Do you blame Bob or the liquor store for the expensive purchase? Bob could have easily chosen a cheap bottle instead.

    + Bob earns 10K pm. He wants a car that will cost him 5K pm. If the bank grants Bob’s loan application, do you blame the bank for Bob’s irresponsible decision, or do you blame Bob? On a side note: Banks should have a responsibility to advise the client about his decision, however the final outcome is
    based on Bob’s decision.

    Capitec, FNB, Absa, and Nedbank offer basic banking for under R5.00 per month, however consumers rather use an account that cost R100.00pm.
    FNB – R3.95
    Capitec – 4.50
    Absa – Free (if you dep R2K pm)
    Nedbank – Free

    It’s all about the status game in South Africa. Consumers don’t like these basic accounts, because the banks don’t provide a Gold/Platinum card.
    The same reason, consumers will buy a brand car such as VW or Toyota rather than a Kia or Hyundai (which of more value for money).

    I believe bank fees are quite high, however reducing them won’t make a difference. It won’t encourage savings.
    If banks cut their banking fees by 50%, will be consumers save the other 50%? No they won’t! They will rather spend it on foolish items.
    I would like to see banks keep the fees unchanged and offer greater saving vehicles. Offer savings accounts with +6% interest rates, not the unsatisfactory 4-5% currently offered. Consider the two products below which can be offered;

    +Open up a gold cheque account, with overdraft, and internet banking for a flat rate of R70.00pm and get a 7day notice deposit account
    with a prime linked interest rate of 6% for amounts greater than 2K and 6.5% for amounts greater than 100K.

    +Open up a gold cheque account, with overdraft, and internet banking for a flat rate of R70.00pm and get a 7day notice deposit account
    with a prime linked interest rate of 6%. If you save 10% of your salary into this account per month, you will get 50% of your fees paid into
    the savings account. Banks can offer other saving products as well, such as shares, gold or unit trusts.

    This is how savings should be forced upon the consumer. You can’t trust that the consumer will save, if bank fees are reduced.

    43% of the respondents say that it is ‘impossible to understand fees.’ However, how many of these respondents made an effort to talk to people, accountants, or the bank staff about these ‘impossibilities’?
    South Africans need to stop shifting the blame and start taking action with what we have, now!

    I also agree with your comment: ‘naivety of bank customers’.
    Yesterday, on the Capitec Bank’s facebook page, Capitec posted a comment:
    ‘I would much rather have a bank that pays 1% interest on savings with NO charges…rather than 6-7%”.
    A majority of the users agreed to this statement, which just goes to show the lack of education with regardless to banking.

    I believe banking and personal finance should be incorporated into the school curriculum at grades 11 and 12. The life orientation subject should address personal finance.

    Reply
    • Thank you for your very insightful comment and analysis. The Capitec facebook comment shows that people perceive more value in no fees than in higher savings rates, and as you point out it is unlikely that they would actually invest the amount they save from bank fees. So the best solution to boost savings is to keep the fees and give better interest rates

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Maya Fisher-French author of Money Questions Answered

Previous Articles